Categories
Anti-Semitism Entertainment/culture History Holocaust Holocaust denial Movies Politics World War II

Who should play David Irving?

I just learned yesterday from a link a friend sent me and from Professor Deborah Lipstadt’s blog that the team of producers who made The Soloist have optioned the movie rights to Professor Lipstadt’s book History on Trial: My Day in Court With a Holocaust Denier, which is the story of the libel suit brought against her by Holocaust denier David Irving in the U.K., a lawsuit that Irving ultimately lost big time.

This is excellent news. Having read her book, as well as Richard Evans’ account of the trial, Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial, I had always thought that the story of David Irving’s ill-fated attempt to silence Professor Lipstadt by suing her for libel in the U.K., whose libel laws are notoriously plaintiff-friendly, would make an excellent movie. It has it all: Drama, fighting against long odds, and, above all, a villain who is a caricature of the worst of British blowhards, David Irving. (On second thought, it doesn’t have romance; hopefully the producers won’t try to add a cheesy romantic subplot…)

I realize that optioning the rights to a book is a long way from actually shooting a movie and that many are the stories whose rights are optioned that never find their way onto film. Even so, I don’t think it’s too early to start making casting suggestions. Even though it’s a very obvious choice, I vote Meryl Streep to play Professor Lipstadt. However, that leaves the question of who could play David Irving. Irving himself, in a characteristically lame attempt at humor, has suggested John Cleese to play Lipstadt. How droll, Mr. Irving, and, no, Anthony Hopkins is not a good option to play you, unless he does it as Hannibal Lecter, although Jack Nicholson might be a good option if he’s in full The Shining mode. However, having John Cleese play Irving would make sense, especially if he does it in his full-out Basil Fawlty mode. I could totally picture that. Or maybe Rowan Atkinson.

But, hey, that’s just me. What about you? Who should play David Irving in a movie about the Lipstadt trial?

By Orac

Orac is the nom de blog of a humble surgeon/scientist who has an ego just big enough to delude himself that someone, somewhere might actually give a rodent's posterior about his copious verbal meanderings, but just barely small enough to admit to himself that few probably will. That surgeon is otherwise known as David Gorski.

That this particular surgeon has chosen his nom de blog based on a rather cranky and arrogant computer shaped like a clear box of blinking lights that he originally encountered when he became a fan of a 35 year old British SF television show whose special effects were renowned for their BBC/Doctor Who-style low budget look, but whose stories nonetheless resulted in some of the best, most innovative science fiction ever televised, should tell you nearly all that you need to know about Orac. (That, and the length of the preceding sentence.)

DISCLAIMER:: The various written meanderings here are the opinions of Orac and Orac alone, written on his own time. They should never be construed as representing the opinions of any other person or entity, especially Orac's cancer center, department of surgery, medical school, or university. Also note that Orac is nonpartisan; he is more than willing to criticize the statements of anyone, regardless of of political leanings, if that anyone advocates pseudoscience or quackery. Finally, medical commentary is not to be construed in any way as medical advice.

To contact Orac: [email protected]

54 replies on “Who should play David Irving?”

It’s tricky casting. I don’t want to put the face of an actor I actually like on that execrable human being. Maybe…William Shatner?

How about Mel Gibson? He has limited talent; but he is naturally stupid.

Oooh–given his apparent antisemitic views, this would be an interesting way to commit career suicide.

Really now, it’s gotta be Jim Carrey for the full-on irony factor. He can do his semi-retarded “nutty professor” imitation and we can find a role for a certain buxom blonde too. C’mon. Dude had the chops to play the Grinch . . .

How about Clifford Rose? He’s had plenty of experience playing a rather smarmy intellectual Nazi.

Ralph Fiennes has the “villain” section of the casting world nicely cornered (and he WAS Amon Goth in Schindler’s List). However, would Irving be a step up or a step down from Lord Voldemort?

Tom Cruise – he’s both played a nazi and is a denialist (and crank). He’d fit into the part.

@4: Brian Cox is from Dundee and can do several British accents

My vote to play Irving would be Richard Wilson, who can portray the mean spirited very well.

Anthony Ainley would’ve been a good choice. He had the slimy, somewhat ineffective villain who thought he was much cleverer than he was down pat.

Henry Czerny does evil quite well (“The Boys of St Vincent”, “Clear and Present Danger”) and, if memory serves, even looks a bit like Irving.

However, that leaves the question of who could play David Irving. Irving himself, in a characteristically lame attempt at humor, has suggested John Cleese to play Lipstadt.

Actually, according to the link you gave, John Cleese was suggested by one Simon Round. Maybe you saw the box on the side with Irving’s comments on this.

Anyway, to put in my two cents, they should get the guy who played the main villain (can’t remember the character’s name or the actor’s) in Schindler’s List.

“Even though it’s a very obvious choice, I vote Meryl Streep to play Professor Lipstadt.”

I must have missed something somewhere. I was under the impression that you were favourably disposed towards Professor Lipstadt…

Michael Gambon, a fine actor who (no offence to him) does a fine protrayal of vile human beings.

How about someone with real class, as a contrst to the real Irwing?
I am thinking about a certain shakespearian actor…. Patrick Stewart 🙂

If you people actually want a serious movie, which does the book justice, as opposed to just mocking Irving (a fine sport in its own right) – well, Patrick Stewart is a very, very good actor, and quite capable of playing a convincing and serious villain. And while I can empathize with people who don’t want their favorite actor associated with Irving, a good movie needs a villain played by a good actor.

Rowan Atkinson and John Clese are also capable of playing serious villains, but not, I think, to the extent that Patrick Stewart is.

Unrelated, but something I wanted to bring to your attention: woo is infesting the NYTimes comments on the swine flu article.

http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2009/04/27/world/27flu.html?permid=83#comment83

“Why is the CDC so quiet about the symptomology of the victims? Homeopathy offers excellent prophylactic remedies such as Ocillococcinum for a broad range of flu strains. Let the truth be known.

— Dr. Bruck, Raleigh NC”

Excellent, more Tamiflu for myself and my family.

If Brian will be doing his King Richard IV impersonation from Black Adder, then perfect! Loads of bombast and noise in those performances.

Speaking of character actors from Black Adder how about Tony Robinson – who played ‘Baldrick’ in the series.
I have a cunning plan! I’ll sue Deborah Lipstadt for libel!

Santiago Segura definitively.

He just has to “britishy” Torrente, et voilà…

Oh, don’t give all the good roles to Streep! After all, given that no fancy accents or period dress are required here, we should give some other actress a shot. Jennifer Connelly’s got the chops, and she’d be willing to wear a short auburn wig for the part, I’m sure.

Two possibilities jump immediately to mind.

Kenneth Branagh reprising Gilderoy Lockhart in the second Harry Potter movie
Steve Buscemi reprising that weaselly dude in Fargo.

Or as his fans call him, “BRIAN BLESSED!!!”

Just the right mix of kitsch and bombast.

Nice idea but I can’t agree – there’s just something altogether too lovable about Brian Blessed. There is absolutely nothing lovable about David Irving.

How about John Hurt? He can do evil with the best of them and he struck just the right note playing Alan Clarke – superficially charming, but ultimately sleazy.

Sadly, the ideal choice died seven years ago, the magnificent James Gregory — “Sen. Johnny Iselin” from THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE. But you have to pick a major character and a good actor for the movie to have the effect we all want. (Another obvious choice were he still aline would have been Nigel Hawthorne from YES, MINISTER.)

I’m tempted to suggest Davuid Jason, but I tend to thinbk he can do anything. (But for Lipstadt it HAS tio be Glenn Close, as good as Streep is.)

The movie has to be as much about Irving as Lipstadt. In fact, if I were writing or directing it (hahaha) I would make it so that someone who left halfway through and knew nothing about it from reviews would think it was pro-Irving, then the last half would show his gradual but complete demolition.

I hope the person who said “Hugh Laurie can do British” was joking- he doesn’t “do British” as he is roughly as British as humanly possible. His father won a Gold Medal in rowing in the 1948 Olympics, he was born in Oxford, and went to Eton then Cambridge…

Then again I can’t really blame you given how absolutely flawless his accent is in House.

My suggestion- the guy who play Nixon in Frost/Nixon?

more importantly than the accent, he needs to be instantly recognizeable. He has to be redeable as a good debater since it is a serious subject and the court talks go pretty ugly (especially between him and Richard J. Evans)

how bout
James Garner or Robert Duvall
(FYI Kurt Russel would make a great Richard Evans)

Comments are closed.